DavidStewart_20181217_0048

as he told us.

9 q Just state what you know of your own knowledge.

a I know afterwards I saw the certificate of the
new Capital in Mr. Tillinghast's possession,
because I know I had some quarrel with him about it.

10 q And it was the certificate of two hundred shares?

a It was two hundred shares of the new capital
in place of the original two hundred shares of the
original Eight and a half millions.

11 q Do you know whether it was two hundred shares
of the purported twenty million issue, or two
hundred shares of the purported [caret]"one" hundred million
issue.

a "I think of the twenty million issue."[all crossed out up to here] "or rather"[written above and crossed out] I think it
was the second increase of the 1 hundred million issue.

12 q You think so?

a I think so; I will not be certain about that.

13 q Do you know when that new certificate
was issued?

a I do not.

14 q And that was the certificate that passed under the
decree in the case of Eliza Brannan against Samuel Brannan''?

a Yes, sir.

15 q You say you do not know what consideration was
received by Mrs. Brannan for that?

a Only from hearsay.

CROSS EXAMINATION
[double underlined in red]

1 q "By Judge Sanderson."[double underlined] Was the cause of action as set
forth in the complaint of Samuel Brannan, against
the Central Pacific Railroad Company and others, the
subject matter which was transferred to Mrs. Brannan
by the decree in the divorce case? Did not the whole
cause fo under that?

"Mr. Cohen."[double underlined] We object to that because the decree is the

[bottom left margin:] Page 4