4

[?] since the purchase of the land, has expended considerable
sum of his own money, in 'improvement' thereon, & has in conjunction with his
wife & child, been supported from the [?].

L has filed a bill for divorce a [?], on the ground of [?],
which {?} [?] admits, [?] in the payer for a divorce; demanding
however, the [custardy?] of the child, and a [proportionate?] allowance out
of the [h?]-fund for his support. & also files a cross-hill [investing?] upon
being [re-imbursed?] for his expenditures for 'improvements' upon the
estate.

The questions [prop?] are substantially, these; -
1. If [?] entitled to a support, out of the [?]_estate, (as one of L's family),
2. If L obtains a divorce, is be entitled to anything out of the [?]_estate
by [?] of any marital right?
3. If L obtains a divorce, is be entitled to be re-imbursed out of the [trust?].
estate, for his expenditures in the way of 'improvements' thereon?4. So, can he properly demand that an allowance shall be made
for the child's support out of the [?] estate?
5. Supporting an allowance [proper?] to be made for the child, how & to what extend [?] it to be made?
And to these, may properly be added the following:

(1). Whether the case is altered, or H's rights [?] affected,
by the fact that the purchase of the land was [?] made by F &
[?] [formally?]?

(2). Whether by the law of Alabama, (where the case [?]), {the} L
is clothed with a separate estate; and if not, how [F's?] marital rights
are [?] {p?} affected?

Of these questions in order: