Find A ProjectSign Up To TranscribeSign In
Globe Icon EN
DeutschEnglishEspañolFrançaisPortuguês

(seq. 11)

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

3 revisions
Judy Warnement at Mar 18, 2021 01:11 PM
Judy Warnement
Judy Warnement
Diane Rielinger

(seq. 11)

[H]. rosmarinifolium? "I have found some difficulty in determining this plant.
It is evidently the H. fasciculatum of Willdenow, but Willdenow has cer-
[t]ainly mistaken the H. fasciculatum of Michaux, which he probably already
[d]escribed as the H. galioides. This plant was considered by Dr. Muhlebnerg
s [Muhlenberg]
the H. rosmarinifolium of LaMarck, and as the name is pecularly appropriate,
have retained it.

It has always appeared to me remarkable that this, which is in the low
country of Carolina and Georgia, is the most common of our frutescent species,
[s]hould have been overlooked by both Walter and Michaux.

(seq. 11)

[H.?] rosmarinifolium? "I have found some difficulty in determining this plant.
It is evidently the H. fasciculatum of Willdenow, but Willdenow has cer-
ainly mistaken the H. fasciculatum of Michaux, which he probably already
[d]escribed as the H. galioides. This plant was considered by Dr. Muhlebnerg [Muhlenberg]s
the H. rosmarinifolium of LaMarck, and as the name is pecularly appropriate,
have retained it.

It has always appeared to me remarkable that this, which is in the low
country of Carolina and Georgia, is the most common of our frutescent species,
[s]hould have been overlooked by both Walter and Michaux.