Elliott, Stephen, 1771-1830. Stephen Elliott papers, 1791- approximately 1947. Observations on the genus Glycine, and some of its kindred genera, 1818; unsigned manuscripts. gra00020. Archives of the Gray Herbarium, Botany Libraries, Harvard University.

ReadAboutContentsHelp
Contains a printed article, Observations on the genus Glycine, and some of its kindred genera, by Stephen Elliott, read June 23, 1818, and published in the Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia the same year. The last page is copied by hand. There are also two manuscript fragments in an unknown hand, concerning activities of the South Carolina Committee of Correspondence prior to the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War, differences in European and American culture and societies, and education, as well as a manuscript note to Elliott requesting more copy, presumably referring to copies of his A sketch on the botany of South-Carolina and Georgia.

Pages

(seq. 11)
Complete

(seq. 11)

1818] Genus Glycine. 373 guminibus compressis falcaltis ; radicales apetali, fertiles, legumnibus ovatis, torulosis, monospermis.

1. Monoica. Glycine monoica. Willd. Sp. Pl. 3, p. 1055.-Mich. 2, p. 64.-- Pursh, 2, p. 485. Anon. Caroliniens? Walt. p. 188.

To this genus the Glycine subterranea, sarmentosa, and comosa, probably belong; but as I am unacquainted wiht their plants, I have omitted their specific characters.

In ascribing to the cauline flowers of this genus a compressed falcate legume, I have relied on the general accurary of Walter. I have never been able to discover one fertile. If this should be an error, while it would render the name I have given to this genus less appropriate, it would show more strongly the necessity of removing it from its present station. In truth I know no principles of classification by which the G. monoica, tomentosa, angulosa, frutescens, and apios, can continue members of one common family.

Last edit about 4 years ago by Judy Warnement
(seq. 12)
Blank Page

(seq. 12)

This page is blank

Last edit about 4 years ago by Judy Warnement
(seq. 13)
Complete

(seq. 13)

that the committe of correspondence be authorized to convene the [?] again to appoint delegates to meet on behalf of the [Union?] on to make each other (Meetings) arrange [events?] as [?] any (blush very often, often they blush, will blush) necessary to [improve?] our cabinets[?].

That the Committee of Correspondence be authorized to convene at a future day the Citizens of Charleston, if it should appear to them necesary or important that delegates should be appointed from this City to meet delegates from other parts of the Union to support the views of our Citizens and represent their interests.

Struck with the inferiority of our institutions to the establishments of the continent - Patriotism will blush when it compares the splendid escertions which have been made by some of the most petty Princes of Europe to promote the instruction of their subjects with the feeble and desultory efforts of Republican America to enlighten those citizens on whose virtue and intelligence and of course on whose education this[?] welfare so materially depends.

Last edit about 4 years ago by Judy Warnement
(seq. 14)
Complete

(seq. 14)

Let it not either be supposed that all knowledge has been transferred to the English language, or that it contains within itself all the materials that are required in literary researches. In the short space of twelve pages in Gibbon which I had to examine in reference to a particular object I was referred to twenty eight authorities, three only were in the Enlish language.

The Europeans have accused us of want of talent but they have already been convinced that for all the practical purposes of life we labour under no deficiency. Wherever the Natives of the United States have come fairly into comparison or competition with the people of Europe no deficiency (inferiority) either of talent or energy has been discovered [?] [are?] inferior to them in those points (circumstances) which the state [?] our society renders it impossible that we should be equal -- They reproach us with our want of literature and science, we very unwisely get angry at this reproach while in fact it is necessarily true -- We have not within our reach the materials of which learning is composed, the means of becoming a literary people -- I mean when compared to the Scholars of Europe to whom so many sources of instruction are constantly open. We are accused by the writers of Europe of neglecting our literary institutions. For to talk some few exceptions, in this reproach we must still submit. In this country we have spoken much of literary institution. For to talk is one of the talents which has never been denied us, but we have barely if ever acted as if under a deep sense of its high and vital importance. Every man who has travelled in Europe is instantly

Last edit about 4 years ago by Judy Warnement
(seq. 15)
Complete

(seq. 15)

Alas how much is it to be lamented that a people abounding in wealth and celebrated for liberality should only be generous to foreign institutions. That while [?] : & 10 of those are [raised?] to promote objects which affect us but remotely and accidentally. No insttution can flourish at home for want of support.

Why have we not Coleges &c [?] any in our naiton but because we neglect to provide the endowments which the patriotism and wisdom of our neighbors have provided for their [universities?].

Last edit about 4 years ago by Judy Warnement
Displaying pages 11 - 15 of 18 in total