377

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
kaprobison at Mar 29, 2024 01:16 AM

377

350
W. C. Butler
Richmond Nov 15th 1861
Rev Mr Butler
Dear Sir
The Vestry of St John's church have received and
carefully considered your note dated October 8th occupying the
position that we are to each other, it is a source of regret that we
should be compelled to dissent from any views or position taken
by our Pastor, but availing ourselves of your invitation to
speak freely on these subjects and feeling deeply our responsibility
as Curators of the interest of the congregation, we cannot hesitate
with candour and freedom to do so. We shall do so with
less reluctance as both have the same end in view,
and differ only as to the best mode of promoting the
welfare of the Church and the true interest of those
committed to your charge.

Our house of worship not being in close proximity
to the thickly settled portions of our city does
not enjoy the same advantages for accession to its
members than those more fortunately located do.

Having to depend upon the material within
our reach, it behoves us not only to be sedulous
and diligent in attracting it to our beloved old
edifice, but alas to conform to the customs and
usages of those whose interest and sympathy we

377

350
W C Butler
Richmond Nov 15th 1861
Rev Mr Butler
Dear Sir
The Vestry of St John's church have received and
carefully considered your note dated October 8th occupying the
position that we are to each other, it is a source of regret that we
should be compelled to dissent from any views or position taken
by our Pastor, but availing ourselves of your invitation to
speak freely on these subjects and feeling deeply our responsibility
as Curators of the interest of the congregation, we cannot hesitate
with candour and freedom to do so. We shall do so with
less reulctance as both have the same end in view,
and differ only as to the best mode of promoting the
welfare of the Church and the true interest of those
committed to your charge.

Our house of worship not being in close proximity
to the thickly settled portions of our city does
not enjoy the same advantages for accession to its
members than those more fortunately located do.

Having to depend upon the material within
our reach, it behoves us not only to be sedulous
and diligent in attracting it to our beloved old
edifice, but alas to conform to the customs and
usages of those whose interest and sympathy we