Letter from Manasseh Cutler to Joseph Torrey, February 16, 1810

ReadAboutContentsHelp

Pages

cutler-letters_joseph-torrey_1810-02-16_01
Incomplete

cutler-letters_joseph-torrey_1810-02-16_01

Hamilton Feb. 16th 1810 My Dear Sir I have just recieved from Mr. Jonathan Herrick of Hopkinton (N Hamp) the information I had requested, respecting the cure of the Hydrophobia, by giving the Lobelia [indecipherable], in the case of his son. The son, Henry Herrick, who was bitten, was settled at Windsor, in Vermont, and his Father happened to be with him at the time the symptoms of the disorder commenced, who with great care and anxiety, attended him until his recovery. Mr. [?Jonathan?] Herrick, the Father, [inserted] who [end inserted] is a respectable, wealthy farmer. I have fully acertained to be a man of undaunted veracity. I am also informed by the bearer of his letter, that he felt much solicitude to give a correct account of the case of his Son. To obtain the information I desired from a man unacquainted with medical matters, I conceived it left to state a number of plain questions, and request an answer to each of them. The following are the questions I proposed, and the answers he has given. To some of the question [crossed out] [indecipherable] [end crossed out] however, I have added further information received from him, not arranged by him, under the questions to which it properly belonged.

This page is incompleteEdit this page
Last edit over 1 year ago by Greta Suiter
cutler-letters_joseph-torrey_1810-02-16_02
Needs Review

cutler-letters_joseph-torrey_1810-02-16_02

2-6th--Was it a large or a small wound? A--A very small wound, resembling the [illegible] [?servatch?] of a pin, about 3/4 of an inch in length. The puppy was near his bed when he was getting up in the morning and attempting to push him away the puppy bit him. He then put him out at the door, and after running a few rods he fell down and died.

2-7th--Was only thing done for him before the symptoms of his disease appeared? A--Nothing. The day, before, two of his children were bitter, and the wounds were so large and so bad he sent for the Doctor who applied something to the sounds, and the children newer had any symptoms of the disease. The Doctor advised my son to have the same remedy applied to his wound, but being so very small he refused.

2-8th--What were his complains when the disease came on? A--A violent headache and symptoms of fever for 3 days, which was followed by a sullen [?dumbness?] lasting 5 days, in which he neither eat, drink or snake. At times he would make a most [?distresing?] noise, at first resembling that of a puppy, and then louder, like the barking and howling of a dog, which could be heard at a great distance--perhaps a mile.

2-9th--How long was it before the symptoms of the disease began to appear? A--About eight months.

2-10th--How long after the symptoms came on before he took the Indian Tobacco? A--About 14 days.

2-11th--In what form was the plant given, or how was it prepared?--How much did he take at a time of the preparation, and how often? A--Half a dozen sprigs were put into a quart of boiling water in which it was sleeper until the water became cool. The portion was 2 table spoonfull at a time.

2-12th--What were the effects which [?followered?] on taking the plant?--Did it [?pure? him? A--Two table spoonfull generally operated about twice as a [?pure?] and then about twice as a purge. As soon as the operation was over, the same quantity was taken again, and this cough was continued continued for three days; at which time large blotches began to appear on his breast. He then began to be rational, but he continued to take the same tea for about 4 weeks, but not so often after he began to mend.

2-13th--How long before his health was restored? A--His health was apparently restored in about 8 weeks.

2-14th--Has he had any symptoms of the disease since? A--He has had som esymptoms of it [illegible] since, but is now in good health

2-15th--How did you obtain the information-that the Indian Tobacco would cure this disease? A--The Doctor who prescribed this medicine was from Europe. He told me if the same herb was jambed or bruised and bound upon the wound or soon as bitten, it would extract the poison and prevent any furrther trouble.

In making this enquiry by better, it appears to me necessary to endeavour to obtain a detailed account, which might lend to strengthen the evidence of the fact we with to ascertain. Perhaps I have omitted some questions which ought to have been stated, but the answers to theseare clearer and fuller than I expected, and I think are satisfactory. The letter was sent to me by W. Josiah Patch, formerly our neighbours, and who now is a new neighbour to W. Herrich. He says W. Herrich gave him a very long and circumstantial account of the case and designed himself now, that see might ever [illegible] I might after, left the account should not be so full as enough desire. Some few circumstances are added to some of the questions which I received from W. Patch. I desired to know whether it was of same Doctor who applied something to the wounds or the children that recommended the Indian Tobacco--Wha that application was and the name and character of the Doctor, but he could not inform me. The old Gentleman was not with his son at the time the children were bitten.

If you think proper, you will communicate this letter to the medical Gentlemen and the medical Society at Salem. I have forward this account to dr. Thacher, who is publishing at American [?Disin?]- latory.

Yours very affectionately M Cutler

Last edit about 1 year ago by alvoisard
Displaying all 2 pages