990388

ReadAboutContentsHelp
Mary Costello requested a rebate on her 1884 property tax. The Committee on Judiciary & Legislation could not render a decision. It turned the request back to the Council with no recommendation, "in view of the large number of similar cases in the city assessment list for 1884." See full description in Digital Collections

Pages

1
Indexed

1

Seattle Jan. the 2nd 1885 To the Honorable the Major and Common Council of the City of Seattle.

Gentlemen I pray your Honorable Boddy [sic] to cause to be returned to me a portion of my City taxes for the year 1884. For the following reasons. First your assessor has put an exorbitant vallue [sic] on my property, lots 2 and 3 in block 104 AA Dennys 2nd addition to the City of Seattle. He has assessed for $1500 the County valued the same at $1000. and block 11 Nagle addition He has assessed for $2400 and the County valluation [all sic] on said block 11 has been 900 dollars. Now while the County valluation has been $1900 the City has assessed the same property for $3.900 which is more than double the countys [sic] valluation. Now the fact is this, that while good many peoples [sic] taxes are lower this year than last, mine are one half higher than last year. And I find on looking over the Citys [sic] tax roll that the assessor has made an unjust and unlawful discrimination against block 11 as compared with block 26 which lies across the street from block 11 and that while he assessed block 11 for 2400 dollars he assessed block 26 for $1600.00

Last edit over 4 years ago by Seattle Municipal Archives
2
Indexed

2

And again the said Block 11 is assessed to two parties, and other errors are in the Citys [sic] assessment roles in regard to said property. I paid my taxes believing there was integrity and justice enough in your Honorable Boddy [sic] to return what I was overcharged.

Mary Costello

Last edit over 4 years ago by Seattle Municipal Archives
3
Indexed

3

To the Honorable Mayor and Common Council of the City of Seattle,

Gentlemen: Your committee on Judiciary and Legislation to whom was referred the petition of Mary Costello, praying for a return of a portion of the taxes of 1884, assessed against the petitioner, find the facts as stated in this petition, but in view of the large number of similar cases in the city assessment list for 1884, your committee beg to report the petition back to your honorable body without recommendation.

B.L. Northup Alfred Snyder

Last edit over 4 years ago by Seattle Municipal Archives
4
Indexed

4

Report of Jud. Committee on Mary Costello's pet. for rebating taxes pd

Jan 16 1885

Last edit over 4 years ago by Seattle Municipal Archives
5
Blank Page

5

This page is blank

Last edit over 4 years ago by Seattle Municipal Archives
Displaying all 5 pages