990816

ReadAboutContentsHelp
A husband and wife submitted affadavits describing their loss of a young bull. After the bull had been lost City officials denied that it had been impounded. The couple discovered later that the bull had been sold to "some sausage factory men living in South Seattle." See full description in Digital Collections

Pages

990816_Page_1
Indexed

990816_Page_1

346 Affidavit of Mrs Fagan

90

Last edit over 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
990816_Page_2
Indexed

990816_Page_2

State of Washington County of King Mrs Fagan of lawful age bring duly sworn deposes and says: that she is the wife of Patrick Fagan and resides with her said husband in the City of Seattle. That in the month of April 1890 her cows strayed away and she found them in the city pound. While there she told the pound master Boyd of having lost a young bull about the last of August 1889 and said Boyd informed this affirmed that their bull was in the pound. about the 1st of Sep 1889. That said animal had by then been sold and that he had himself bought said animal for the sum of $10.00 That he afterward sold said animal to some sausage factoryman living in South Seattle. And further affirmed & [?] Mrs Sarah Fagan Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th Day of August 1890 J W Harrington Notary Public.

Last edit over 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
990816_Page_3
Indexed

990816_Page_3

65 Affidavit of Patrick Fagan

Last edit over 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
990816_Page_4
Complete

990816_Page_4

State fo Washington County of King Patrick Fagan of lawful age bring duly sworn upon his oath states: That he is a citizen of the U S and of the State of Washington and a resident of the City of Seattle and was during all the times hereinafter mentioned a resident of said place. that during the month of August 1889 and prior thereto he was the owner of a fine young bull to years old post of Guernsey and derhau stock work the reasonable value of two hundred dollars: That is the latter part of August 1889 siad animal broke out of his enclosure on the premises of this affiant and strayed therefrom. That this affiant made diligent search for said animal but was unable to find him. That he looked over the City papers to see if such an animal had been empounded and found a notice to the effect that a yound bull had been taken up about the time afficents became missing, but the descriptions as seen in the article of the Post Intelligencer did not accurately describe this animal.

Last edit over 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
990816_Page_5
Indexed

990816_Page_5

That out of n abundance of caution this affiant called time upon one [M?], who was then chief of Police for said City and after describing said animal to him asked said chief [M?] if such an animal had been enpounded, whereupon said [M?] denied that there had ever been such an animal in the City Pound That this affiant also enquired of one Boyd. the City Pound Master if such an animal had been by him empounded and was informed that no such animal had been in the pound. That same time afterward towit: about the 6th of June of this year said pound Master Boyd admitted to this affiant that his said bull was in their pound and that he had been sold to butchersausage factory men in South Seattle. That this affiant enquired of said sausage factory man if his said animal had been bought by them and they said that he had. And Further affiant [?] Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th day of August 1890 J W Harrington Norary Public.

Last edit over 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
Displaying all 5 pages