991209

ReadAboutContentsHelp
The trustees of the Swedish Lutheran Church complained about the water draining from stable near the church. They claimed that the water was damaging the church property and making the area unsanitary. The Committee on Sewers reported that no nuisance existed as stated. The Committee stated that the pool of stagnant water that existed was the responsibility of the property owner and that Mr. Hochbrunn should be notified. See full description in Digital Collections

Pages

1
Indexed

1

32 May 16 1890 Swedish Church for abatement of nuisance 3rd &Pike with reference to stop water from Livery stable Sewer 8 Committee on sewers find no nuisance existing worth mentioning and would recommend that the petition be placed on fle. F A Twichell Chm sewer Com Harry White

Last edit about 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
2
Indexed

2

To the City Council of Seattle Gentlemen: We the undersigned trustees of the Swedish Ev. Lutheran Church, corner at Third and Pike, kindly ask that you will provide,that the livery stable near our church will take hold of the slop water that always is flowing to our lot and does a great damage to us and makes the vicinity unsanitary. We have complained several times to the sewer commissioners, had the have not paid any attention to our complaining Yours Truly Erick Wedeen M W Cauder Daniel Oleson Aug Rudin

Last edit about 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
3
Indexed

3

69 5/23-90 Report of Sewer Committee on Nuisance 4th and Wall Sts Filed May 23 1890 Clerk

Last edit about 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
4
Indexed

4

To the Honorable and Common Council of the City of Seattle: Gentlemen: your committee on Sewers to whom was referred the complaint in reference to a nuisance said to exist on property owned by F Hochbrunn and situated on North Seattle beg to report that we have investigated the matter and find that a nuisance does not exist as stated, being a large pool of Stagnant water which has no outlet at present. Source of said water undoubtly came from the adjoining streets - by the same thing would have occured, were no streets graded above said lots. We find that in all similar cases the property owner has been obliged to either fill up or drain the premises, and would recommend that the same course be followed in this instance, and that Mr Hochbrunn be notified to abate said nuisance inthe manner indicated above.

Last edit about 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
Displaying all 4 pages