Correspondence (incoming): Hubbard, Thomas, 1894-1902

ReadAboutContentsHelp
TLS re Pacific Improvement Co. obligations 1894 Sep 11 ALS re financial matters 1895 May 6 ALS encloses letter 1895 May 9 TLS re non-purchase of Sacramento Transportation stock, with copy of letter from Chas. G. Lathrop to C.F. Crocker re same, Dec. 13, 1895 1895 Dec 24 TLS traffic arrangements Monterey-Mexican Gulf RR, etc. 1896, Jan 25 ALS understood offer to share burden of suit had been declined 1896 Mar 30 TLS disposal of Mexican International Bonds 1897, Jan 20 ALS disposal of Mexican International Bonds 1897 Jan 21 TLS possible extension of Mexican railways. 1897 Feb 2 Tel. Re P. I. Co. representative 1900 Jan 17 Tel. Wait until Mr. Douty comes back 1900 Jan 18 Tel. Re secretary-teasurer of P. I. Co. 1900 Apr 14 Tel. suggests Lathrop and Green for treasurer and secretary of P. I. Co. 1900 Apr 16 TLS re. investments. 1902 Jan 28 ALS will call on her tomorrow 1902 Nov 22 Telegrams, some in code with translations Mar 4, 1896-Feb 5, 1897 and undated



Pages

Untitled Page 31
Complete

Untitled Page 31

We sent F. S. Douty some Bonds for purpose of exchange as you may agree with P.I. Co. the clause you mentioned does not give any new rights it rather limits rights the company now has. It does not commit anyone to building of new Roads if it were omitted it would cause comment to the effect that the Company had abandoned some of its rights under Mexican Concession this would weaken Company with the Mexican Government and the Public and might also injure Market for Bonds.

Copy of telegram from Genl Hubbard to Mrs. Stanford Feb 2, 97.

Last edit almost 3 years ago by shashathree
Untitled Page 32
Complete

Untitled Page 32

We sent F. S. Douty some Bonds for purpose of exchange as you may agree with P.I. Co. The clause you mentioned does not give any rights, it rather limits rights the Company now has. It does not commmit anyone to building of new Roads. If it were omitted it would cause comment to the effect that the Company had abandoned some of its rights under Mexican Concission. This would weaken Company with the Mexican Government and the Public and might also injure market for Bonds.

Copy telegram from Genl. Hubbard to Mrs. L. Stanford Feby 2.1897.

Last edit almost 4 years ago by sevillamarzona
Untitled Page 33
Complete

Untitled Page 33

New York Feby 5. 1897

Think almost any exchange you agree on in San Francisco with P.I. Co. will be accepted here by associates. All associates will have to make exchange on same basis, all being interested in P.I. Co. are on both sides of agreement with it think therefore it would be better to take Bonds yielding same income as those surrendered. No building in Mexico as (is) contemplated at present. Wrote you Feby 3rd on this subject.

Thos. H. Hubbard

To Mrs. Leland Stanford.

Last edit almost 3 years ago by shashathree
Untitled Page 34
Complete

Untitled Page 34

Think almost any Exchange you agree on in San Francisco with P.I. Co. will be accepted here by associates. All associates will have to make exchange on same basis all being interested in P.I. Co. are on both sides of agreement with it think therefore it would be better to take Bonds yielding same income as those surrendered no building in Mexico (is) as contemplated at present. Wrote you Feby 3rd on this subject.

Thos. H. Hubbard

Telegram to Mrs. Leland Stanford Feby 5 / 1897

Last edit almost 4 years ago by sevillamarzona
Untitled Page 35
Complete

Untitled Page 35

W.130.CH.NB.HK.63.DH New York. Feb 5, 1897. Mrs. Leland Stanford, San Fran.

Think almost any channel norwich on in starchy with selig will be arner here by Amos all Amos mystify channel on same basis all being detaste in selg are on both inscribe of adjutant with it think therefore disbanding better lentil Athens norton same dented as those kaffir no awfully in sprightful as (is) contemplated anagraph wrote you feby 3d on this subject.

Thos. H. Hubbard.

Last edit almost 4 years ago by ap20
Displaying pages 31 - 35 of 40 in total