3

Overview Transcribe Versions Help

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is ~~highlighted in red~~, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

3 revisions	jtcampbell at Mar 02, 2022 03:03 AM	Compared with
Feb 27, 2022 jtcampbell Feb 27, 2022 jtcampbell Mar 27, 2017 UVA Law Library	3 2. As to the second question; - there is a considerable conflict of authenticity. The better opinion seems to [see?] to the that the first assignee has preference, because by assign- ment the assigned priority over the assigner , who remain- ed the holder of the other bond, and this priority ^ his subsequent assignment of the latter bond could not take away. The attorneys in [Ragland I Rund. 466?]; ^ Taylor v Spindle 2 [Grah?] 71; 1 [Lum?]. Dig 336.533; 1 [Juck.?], Nelson v Brown 15 [Ala?]. 507, [13 U.S. Dig. 53, Assignment 32]; Keyes v Wood 21 [Vermt?]	3 2. As to the second question; - there is a considerable conflict of authenticity. The better opinion seems to [see?] to the that the first assignee has preference, because by assign- ment the assigned priority over the assigner , who remain- ed the holder of the other bond, and this priority ^ his subsequent assignment of the latter bond could not take away. The attorneys in [Ragland I Rund. 466?]; ^ Taylor v Spindle 2 [Grah?] 71; 1 [Lum?]. Dig 336.533; 1 [Juck.?], Nelson v Brown 15 [Ala?]. 507, [13 U.S. Dig. 53, Assignment 32]; Keyes v Wood 21 [Vermt?]

3

3 revisions

3

3