EN1
Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.
2 revisions | pmr443 at Jun 06, 2019 09:18 PM | |
|---|---|---|
1The case stated by Mr. Toney, pre-sents two questions. I. Whether the [?] who stole the cotton in, and conveyed if [?] the river, to a point. By and above low water mark, are guilty of larceny in Ala; and II, who the parties who receind[?] it at the time point indicated on the river bank, knowing if to have been stolen in [?], are ^legally guilty in Ala of the offence of receiving stolen goods. Knowing than[?] to have been stolen. I. I apprehend that Howard [?] 13 How. 381, learn no doubt that the morality[?] where the goods were deposited by the thieves, way within the jurisdiction of Ga, that of Ala, the eastern line of the latter State, [?] to the case cited being on the top of the western bank of the Chattahoochee, having[?] the [?] of the river, and the western shaling[?] shore within the jurisdiction of Ga? But even if that point were within the jurisdiction of Ala, I should [?] by of opinion start at Common Law, the parties who stole the cotton in Ga a thought it into Ala, could not | 1The case stated by Mr. Toney, pre-sents two questions. I. Whether the [?] who stole the cotton in, and conveyed if [?] the river, to a point. By and above low water mark, are guilty of larceny in Ala; and II, who the parties who receind[?] it at the time point indicated on the river bank, knowing if to have been stolen in [?], are ^legally guilty in Ala of the offence of receiving stolen goods. Knowing than[?] to have been stolen. I. I apprehend that Howard [?] 13 How. 381, learn no doubt that the morality[?] where the goods were deposited by the thieves, way within the jurisdiction of Ga, that of Ala, the eastern line of the latter State, [?] to the case cited being on the top of the western bank of the Chattahoochee, having[?] the [?] of the river, and the western shaling[?] shore within the jurisdiction of Ga? But even if that point were within the jurisdiction of Ala, I should [?] by of opinion start at Common Law, the parties who stole the cotton in Ga a thought it into Ala, could not |