ENPage 1
Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.
2 revisions | pmr443 at Jun 07, 2019 02:13 PM | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1Case submitted by Mr Seurll February 7 1888 From the very[?] kind statement signed by Messn. Duncan a Morgan, exhibited to me by Mr Seurll, latin[?] to the case of Beaty's Admd. v Gilson, and assuming that the value of the 80 acres lost from Beaty's [?] by the adverse claim A Holmes' heirs, is fix-ed at 1500, ^ I am of opinion that that farm is to be abated from the 9000, the amount of Beaty's purchase - money, or the day of the purchase, that is 29 July 1869, and not at the date of eviction[?]. I so conclude from the doctrine as stated 2 Min. [?] (650) 727, and the case there int-ed[?], and especially Thompson v Guthrie. 9 Leigh 107, and Hurrean v Thornhill, 2 N. Bl. 1078, and that conclusion in fortified by the justice and [?] of the case. If Beaty had paid the purchase-money and taken a conveyance with covenant[?] of [?] corresponding to those in the title[?] - there can be no doubt I presume that he or his [?] ,when the eviction which | Page 1Case submitted by Mr Seurll February 7 1888 From the very[?] kind statement signed by Messn. Duncan a Morgan, exhibited to me by Mr Seurll, latin[?] to the case of Beaty's Admd. v Gilson, and assuming that the value of the 80 acres lost from Beaty's [?] by the adverse claim A Holmes' heirs, is fix-ed at 1500, ^ I am of opinion that that farm is to be abated from the 9000, the amount of Beaty's purchase - money, or the day of the purchase, that is 29 July 1869, and not at the date of eviction[?]. I so conclude from the doctrine as stated 2 Min. [?] (650) 727, and the case there int-ed[?], and especially Thompson v Guthrie. 9 Leigh 107, and Hurrean v Thornhill, 2 N. Bl. 1078, and that conclusion in fortified by the justice and [?] of the case. If Beaty had paid the purchase-money and taken a conveyance with covenant[?] of [?] corresponding to those in the title[?] - there can be no doubt I presume that he or his [?] ,when the eviction which |