ENPage 2
Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.
2 revisions | pmr443 at Jun 07, 2019 02:38 PM | |
|---|---|---|
Page 2has taken place in consequence of the Holmes' heir[?], might [?] the due proportion of the purchase-money (of 1500) with intent from the time when Beaty became liable for cents and profit to Holmes' heirs. Their action was begun in 1872, and they were entitled to damages [?] profits for a period not extending 5 years [?], (VC 73. Ch. 131, 830), which would have gone back to 1867, two years before Beaty's purchase. In this case of an executing contract, when M the purchase-money has not been paid, it season to be only [?] justice to [??] at the very comment[?] of the transaction, the date of Gibson's[?] default to the extent of that default, [?] if Beaty some not [?] for the [?] profits to Holmes' heirs, for they were not profits demand from any this belonging to Gilson[?]. | Page 2has taken place in consequence of the Holmes' heir[?], might [?] the due proportion of the purchase-money (of 1500) with intent from the time when Beaty became liable for cents and profit to Holmes' heirs. Their action was begun in 1872, and they were entitled to damages [?] profits for a period not extending 5 years [?], (VC 73. Ch. 131, 830), which would have gone back to 1867, two years before Beaty's purchase. In this case of an executing contract, when M the purchase-money has not been paid, it season to be only [?] justice to [??] at the very comment[?] of the transaction, the date of Gibson's[?] default to the extent of that default, [?] if Beaty some not [?] for the [?] profits to Holmes' heirs, for they were not profits demand from any this belonging to Gilson[?]. |