Page 161

secondary and seeks to contradict the writing - the answers
and every part and parcel of each of them are also
objected to for the same cause. Such portions of the
answers of these witnesses as give the statements of
Moses Walker or others are objected to because not
responsive to the questions propouneded.

Witness John M. Moore -

That part of the second interrogatory which asks on
to what Gunn said about Betts leaving his wife
are objected to by Betts - as also the answers thereto -

That portion of the answer to the second
interrogatory as to what the witness understood is
objected to not being evidence.

Witness E.E. Dubrose. That portion of the second
interrogatory - which seeks the declarations of Gunn as to
Betts leaving Compl are objected to with the answer thereto
The other portions of the answer to this question objected
to because not responsive to the question :

Witness, Jacob B. Nelson -
The Respondent objections to the declaration of Betts as enquired
after in the second interrogatory + the question the whole and
every part being inadmissible in this issue. that portion
of the answers are objected to giving the declarations of Compl.
as being irresponsive to the question.

Motion as to John B. Walker's testimony

1st To suppress the same, because Defendant A. Reese
acted as commissioner who is defendant to the Bill +
stands in the place of hsi intestate A.Walker, who is alledged
to have accepted the trust &c

The sencond - 3rd - 4th - 5th - 6th - 7th - 8th ninth + 10th + every part
and parcel of each are objected to because the same and
every part + parcel of each are leading, irrelevant, secondary,
incompetent + seeks to contradict the written instrument, the
answers to each and every part and parcel are objected
to for the same cause -

That portion of the answers are objected to which gives
the declarations of Moses Walker - not connected with any
act, also the thinks of witness as to Moses Walkers
opinions-
Exceptions to C.C. Mills' testimony
{Maria Betts by her next friend Solon Wellborn. VS
Elisha Betts. G.W. gunn et al.} Exceptions to the testimony