Central Pacific Railroad Company Lawsuits

Q. 13. Do you remember how much land they claimed in that case?

A. No sir; I do not.

Q. 14. Who were the defendants in the Brannan case?

A. "The Central Pacific Railroad Company; The Western Pacific Railroad Company; Leland Stanford; C. P. Huntington; Mark Hopkins; Charles Crocker; E. B. Crocker; Charles Marsh; A. P. Stanford; E. H. Miller Jr.; [caret]B. B. Redding; The San Francisco and Alameda Railroad Company; The San Francisco and Oakland Railroad Company; Wells Fargo and Company; The Contract and Finance Company; The Southern Pacific Railroad Company; The San Joaquin Valley Railroad Company; The California and Oregon Railroad Com= pany; The San Francisco and San Jose Railroad Company; The Dutch Flat "Railroad Company"[crossed out] Wagon Road Company; [care]D. O. Mills; D. O. Mills and Company; A. A. Cohen; John Doe; Richard Roe; John Doe, Jr. and Richard Roe Jr.; the names of the four last named defendants are unknown to the plaintiffs." Those are the names of the defendants in that Complaint.

[bottom left margin:] 71.

issued. Just state as near as you can recollect it?

A. There was Leland Stanford, C. P. Huntington, Charles Crocker, E. B. Crocker, E. H. Miller, B. B. Redding, Jerome Madden, Charles W. Sanger, and two or three others whose names I forget.

"X"[written in margin] Q. 131 The bulk of it was held by Stanford, C. P. Huntington, Hopkins and Charles and E. B. Crocker.

A. Yes sir.

Q. 132 For what consideration was the twenty three thousand nine hundred and fifty shares of the increased Capital stock of the Western Pacific No. 2 issued to the Contract and Finance Company?

A. In consideration of the same a amount of stock held by them in the San Francisco Bay Railroad Company according to the articles of association which I believe were issued share for share.

Q. 133 What was the consideration received by the San Francisco Bay Railroad Company for the issue of this twenty three thousand nine hundred and fifty shares of stock to the Contract and Finance Company.

A. The construction of their road by the Contract and Finance Company.

[bottom left margin:] 28

In the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco, State of California

The County of San Joaquin, Plaintiff } — vs } The Central Pacific Railroad Company } Leland Stanford, C. P. Huntington } Charles Crocker Charles Crocker } Executor of the Estate of E. B. Crocker } deceased, Edward H. Miller Jr. } B. B. Redding, Wells Fargo & Co. } James B. Haggin, Ellen M. Colton } Executrix of the Estate of David } No 359 D. Colton deceased. } Department 7 The Southern Pacific Railroad Company } The Potrero and Bay View Railroad } Company, the California Pacific } Railroad Company, the Rocky Mountain } Coal and Iron Company of Wyoming } Robert Robinson, S. W. Sanderson } The Atlantic and Pacific Telegraph Company } The Western Development Company } Mary Frances Sherwood Hopkins } Samuel F. Hopkins and Moses Hopkins } defendants. }

Supplemental Complaint.

Plaintiff by its attorney now comes and by leave of the Court first had and obtained files this its supplemental complaint against the defendants and for cause of complaint alleges.