John D. Lee Case File

That the said twelve jurors were not of the first eighteen of said fifty jurors drawn to be summoned pursuant to said order; that the said twelve jurors so impanneled were drawn, summoned, selected and impanneled as aforesaid and not otherwise.

Wherefore the said Respondent says that the said Jury so impanneled is not a lawful Jury, and prays judgment of the Court that the said array of jurors be quashed.

Southerland & Bates Spicer Hoge Bishop & McFarland Attys for Deft

No. 31 In 2d Dist Court Utah Territory

The People Etc. vs. John D. Lee et al.

Challenge to the Array of Petit Jurors

Filed July 22, 1875 James R. Wilkins, Clerk

In Second District Court of the Territory of Utah

The people of the United States in the Territory of Utah vs John D. Lee indicted with William H. Dame et al.

Said John D. Lee by his counsel, moves this Court that it proceed no farther in the trial of this case at this time, for the reason that there is no legal term of the District Court for the Second Judicial District, is now being held. This motion is founded on The proclamation of the Governor[filing?] the terms of Court for this territory-and the Journal of said Court

Spicer, Hoge, Bishop Southerland & Bates & McFarland

July 29. 1875