City of Seattle Records

616 JOURNAL OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE Apr 3/85 Chas O'Hara for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from April 7, 1885 John Merigan for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Mar 27, 1885 Robt Walt for retail Malt liquors for 3 months from Apr 4, 1885 Chas G Steinweg for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Apr 3, 1885 John Collins for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Mar 25, 1885 Geo K Beede for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Apr 5, 1885 James Miles for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Apr 15, 1885 Bittner & Theiler for retail Malt liquors for 3 months from Apri 16, 1885 Joseph Francisco for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Apr 7, 1885 Wm Busha for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from April 17, 1885 Geo Meister for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from April 8, 1885 The vote on granting said application stands as follows, In favor Harrington, Rinehart, Snyder, Sox, Yesler & Latimer Against the same none. Power & Meyers refused a license Ordered that the application of Powers & Meyers for a Retail liquor license to sell intoxicating liquors be rejected because the bond therefor is not in conformity to the provisions of Ordinance No 637. In favor of rejecting said application Rinehart, Snyder, Sox & Latimer. Agains rejecting the same Harrington & Yesler James Swain refused a license Ordered that the application of James A Swain for a Retail liquor license to sell malt liquors be rejected for the reason that the place where said license is to be used is a locality in which the sale or disposal of intoxicating or malt liquors shoudl not be allowed.In favor of rejecting said application Harrington, Rinehart, Snyder, Sox, Yesler & Latimer Against the same none. John Farnham refused license Ordered that the application of John Farnham for a retail license to sell malt liquors be rejected for the reason that the place where said license is to be used is a locality in which the sale of disposal of intoxicating or malt liquors should not be allowed. In favor ot rejecting said applictaionRinehart, Snyder, Sox, & Latimer Against rejecting the same Harrington & Yesler Shaw & Alger refused license Ordered that the application of Shaw & Alger for a Retail license to sell intoxicating liquors be rejected because the bond therefore is not in conformity to the provision of Ordinance No 637. In favor of rejecting said application Rinehart, Snyder,Sox, Yesler & Latimer. Against rejecting the same Harrington