Page 11

Even so, I'm pretty concerned
that they would change the rules.
After "30 years of development"
you think a 2 year aberration would
not warrant changing the rules.

It didn't work too well in Feb
of 83 so they "improved" it. Or
did they just make it fit the data points?

Despite all its fault, RWS is still
very well documented. And the test
case is well diversified though it
doesn't cover all possibilities.

But to conclude, I have to
say that analyzing stocks is boring
and frustranting. There's so much
data and so little time to try
different analyses. I'll leave that
research to others, and stick
with what I enjoy. The profits
after 50% tax aren't worth
the time. And who needs more
money. Even now I don't feel
I could use more, until a BMW
733 fits my image.

And it's purely technical. Immoral?