Page 23

There have been so many more times that I've been in LA and decided it just is not for me. August '82 (tired out due to drugs) (I wanted to be coding - meticulous mood), Feb '83 (RAINY and I wasn't working while I was there 5/89), July 4 '83, July '84, Labor Day '84, and even just passing through Thx '84. And now I have a game with myself to see how long I can avoid going there.

But San Francisco has seen many more good times. Last summer, however, I realized how hard it would be to live in such a dense population. And it's doesn't have very many tree-lined streets, or houses with yards, and many people have a much lower standard of living there then they would elsewhere.

But comparing the two, LA vs SF, I'd have to say I'd feel that SF were the wiser choice. And the real question then is SF vs Seattle?! Or should I do both for awhile. Get apartment there for weekends, and take taxis, so I don't need car